It’s sad, but the KFP reference actually adds to it. Imagine reading any serious CEO attempting to sign players literally from another sport at a fishing competition. Part of the problem, I’m afraid. The solution appears very much that Chambers and Burgess continue uninterrupted, time to move on from KFP.

https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/liam-knights-future-stance-revealed-10129441?505= Knight wants to stay at FC, but knows it rests on next weeks meeting

https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/liam-knights-future-stance-revealed-10129441?505= Knight wants to stay at FC, but knows it rests on next weeks meeting

Whenever I've seen Knight he has looked like a penalty machine. A big body yes but not sure he is a great signing.

Knight has only conceded 3 penalties in 5 games so not sure he's a penalty machine.


He's been good for us, especially considering he had no pre season.  Getting better as he gets up to match fitness and can do big minutes.  Defence is excellent 

Just remembered Chris Satae is still off contract next year (i think), Would be happy with him as a Musgrove replacement. I'd still keep Vaughan as i think he still offers plenty to the team.

I thought the quota change was already in place for next year, i didn't realise it was still yet to be decided.
It would free up Yates spot for us at least. I don't think it will be Green lit though to be honest as it creates an unfair competition in that respect. As say (for example) 10 team only have 7 overseas players but 2 have 9-10 potential overseas it can create a bigger gulf.
The fact we're trying to create a more even playing field for a more competitive competition, this would go against this and create an even bigger imbalance.