Has gone on loan to Huddersfield for a month.

That seems a little strange to me,( but what do I know). They are top 4 this year and I would argue that Dwyer will strengthen them. He is a lively player, makes good breaks, gets the team moving forward. He is dangerous close to the opposition line. No wonder Anderson has "thanked TS and the club for letting us bring him in". Surely we could have played him at Keighley and given him game time with us ?

Making space for Daryl Clark?

Can he play half back ? seems a bit of a strange one as we dont seem to have any problems at Hooker, unless PA is planning on shifting one of our hookers to half back.

I don't think so. He was clearly playing a high standard of rugby in the Championship, so it was logical to move him on to a bigger challenge; SL. But we have two ageing hookers and I would imagine both are likely to retire over the next two years, so we need two replacements. If we let Dwyer go, it wouldn't be until he has reached his potential, and he is not there yet.

Not often you see a club in fourth place loan a player to the club at the top of the ladder! Good luck to Brad.

We play Hudds on 5th May so will be miffed if he plays against us.

According to Chris Taylor of the Guardian he won't be available to play against us. He is cup tied having played for Swinton the other day leaving him with just two potential games over the next month.

huddersfield with lunt to leeds last year, but that was more political than anything

He didn't play for Swinton in the Challenge Cup so he is not cup tied

My bad, forever getting him and Shaw muddled up. No idea why! In that case going off what Chris said he won't play in the cup at Warrington's request.

Huddersfield= a team full of hookers.

Leeds? Top of the ladder?